Serial Experiments Lain Revisited: Episode 06

From the very beginning, Serial Experiments Lain is unusual, abstract, hard to grasp. Just when you think the show couldn’t get any stranger, it does, with episode six taking us deeper into the strangeness and also pulling us out. While the mysteries of the Wired, the Knights, and Lain herself deepen (with the most remarkable image in the episode being of a naked Lain floating in the sky), a conventional conversation with a deviant researcher seems so absolutely normal that it doesn’t belong in the series. And yet, maybe it’s there, besides as an infodump, to remind us that at the center of Lain is a divide—between the digital and physical, real and unreal, and connection and disconnect.

Layer 06

Lain is growing, both as a person and a “powerful force” on the Wired. Her hardware setup now includes advanced cooling systems, and Lain spends inordinate time on the Wired, especially speaking to the Knights, whom she considers friends. However, she later uses her power to talk to the avatar of Professor Hodgeson, a man who created the KIDS project, an extrasensory system that lead to the deaths of children fifteen years ago and is now being used again on the Wired, after being troubled by seeing a heavenly image of herself in the sky while out with her “real life” friends. More personally troublesome is that she has become a target—her computer’s cooling system is sabotaged, and apparently not by the men who have been watching her all along.

Fulfillment in the Wired?

Navi…Loading…

The title for layer six of Serial Experiments Lain is “Kids,” and more so than for any episode title so far, this one points clearly and obviously at characters and plot central to the episode. Kids lift their hands in worship toward the sky; KIDS is the name of the project that the professor ran, and which is now again in progress; and Lain is still a child herself, subtly indicated by showing her still-girlish figure several times, in contrast to a long shot on her “sister,” who has filled out.

There’s an emphasis here on innocence, as there is throughout the series. Lain is selected, perhaps, because she’s so naive and “pure,” compared to Mika, who’s actions were more worldly and served as a sacrifice in episode five. The motif is present throughout the episode, especially with the young children that Lain sees (though her friends also see them later), lifting their arms up to the sky. Two thoughts occur to me—the children represent innocence because of their ages (younger than Lain), but they also represent purity. We only see them from behind—they’re faceless entities without color or personality, almost angelic as they worship. And who do they worship? Lain herself, as a gigantic image of her appears in the sky, bright and without clothing, unveiled by clouds that roll back like a scroll. There seems to be an intention hear to cause audiences to think upon the Virgin Mary, perhaps, from Renaissance paintings, or maybe Jesus, similarly disrobed in many paintings of the time (especially when pictured on or heading toward the cross).

Lain is shaken by the image, and she’s meant to be, as the Knights, or whomever it is who is speaking to Lain, continues to lead her down a path toward godhood, whether its for their worship as well or to use her to some end. But Lain is resistant. She has demonstrated signs of resistance in previous episodes, especially when it came to questioning (for the “blank slate” trait that she often seems to exhibit, Lain has a strong sense of integrity), but goes more full throttle in this episode. The doppelganger personality, which is forceful and upfront, is one with Lain when she’s on the Wired, as she aggressively seeks connections in regards to the “game” that worries her, and both interrogates and admonishes Professor Hodgeson.

Afterward, her friends from the Wired, the Knights, aren’t as friendly as they were before, and in fact, the Men in Black accuse them of planting the device in her cooling system that leads to an explosion in her room. Are the controlling forces trying to put Lain back on the proper way and force her off the path of resistance? Have they decided it’s too late, and that Lain should perish while they raise another?

Lain, however, has come too far to go down without a fight—she’s been emboldened and now fights her fears, as is demonstrated when she confronts the Men in Black socially, which for her is as great a difficulty as any. And Lain is very powerful. Now armed with a sense of justice and a better understanding of the complexity of relationship, in which she can see that Internet relationships don’t always trump real ones; real friendships can be up and down, but aren’t necessarily inauthentic; and connection is a multi-faceted thing, Lain is on her way to face the god of the Wired and perhaps find out what it means to be that kind of god, and whether that is something truly godly at all.

Present Day. Question Time.

  • Lain the…Avenger? Not only is Lain now on some sort of quest to help children past and present, she actually seems cool like a superhero, particularly in a scene when she comes home, ditches her normie clothes, speaks her computer to life, and gets to work with a serious face.
  • Viewers today might think that Lain is ahead of its time in how it depicts the depth of online relationships, but I remember that my most satisfying friendships in 1998 were the digital variety. They were exciting and fun and fulfilling and painful—and all in one episode, Lain is discovering the same regarding the Knights. Did you have online friendships twenty years ago when this show first aired?
“So what if I am an old fogey?”
  • Hodgeson is a creep. Right to the end, he’s looking to find peace for his guilt (unable and unwilling to do the things in real life that would have brought him peace before death) instead of thinking about the children. WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?
  • “Kensington Experiments” sounds appropriately unethical.
  • A “Cheshire Cat” is introduced in the episode, and Lain is downright rude to him. It’s a nice allusion, though, as Lain certainly works as a cyberpunk version of Alice.

Let us know your thoughts below! And join us next Friday for the next installment.

2 thoughts on “Serial Experiments Lain Revisited: Episode 06

  1. So what exactly is the point of the spooky/evil game and the mad scientist who killed children by sucking psychic energy out of them? Having finished the entire series, I still have idea what that was about. I watched this episode and thought “Oh, clearly this has some important connection to the overall story” …and then I never picked up on one.

    Re: whether the series is ahead of its time: the only aspect of SEL that really implies any particularly time period to me is appearance of the technology – the computers LOOK like ones we had, say, twenty years ago (which of course, is not coincidentally when the series was made). Phones are the same way: does a series have phones with cords? Bulky cell phones? Flip phones? Smart phones? You can estimate about when it must have been made based on the type of phones. I guess there’s also how the Wired is depicted visually. Does it use VR in some way? Or is the show just metaphorically depicting how immersed Lain and others are in the Wired?

    Yeah, the mad scientist was a serious creep. “Look, forget about the fact that I tortured a bunch of kids to death for SCIENCE! and just be nice to me because I’m sick.”

    Extended tangent about online relationships ca. late ’90s: I suppose the first online “community” I ever participated in was the message boards for the Star Wars Customizable Card Game (may it rest in peace). Around around 2001-2002, after moving to Hawaii and far away from all friends, I first started using AIM (also RIP). And there were blogs. *goes to check old blog* Looks like the first time I actually wrote a blog of my own was July 2007 – over…ten years ago?! 😮 LOL. Pretty sure I knew of blogging for several years before that but was too scared of the internet to actually do it myself (I think I’m generally a little too wary of new technology). And at this point…hmm. At this point I’m a mod for someone’s Twitch stream (used to be mod of another but quit), on FB, on Twitter, a mod on the forums of an indie computer game maker, a sporadic participant on the forums of another old CCG…and obviously I’ve gotten sucked in to BtT. 😀 I still have a lot of questions about cyberspace relationships. Is it truly possible to be friends with someone I’ve never met, whom I know only through how they present themselves online? Can such a relationship actually deserve to be called “friendship?” And yet I can’t deny that I have felt connections with and been influenced by people I know only via the web. And that doesn’t even touch online dating: the idea of finding a spouse by first getting to know a person over the internet just sounds insane to me (notwithstanding knowing peope who have thriving and happy marriage as a result of it). I don’t want to wrongly devalue the significance of online connections – but my doubts about how “real” it is never quite go away.

    Like

    1. All good points about the Lain episode…but I’ll jump right into the online relationship stuff haha. I’m glad you brought up a skeptical viewpoint about online relationships. It’s needed in a time when young people have a far larger and more authentic digital profile than they did in the past, and are so willing to believe that online friendships and romances are just as “real” as those in real life. I think the truth of the matter lies somewhere between and all around. The digital is just DIFFERENT. It’s an easier access point to jump into relationships; it eases the tension that so many who spend time in community communities feel with real life connection. That’s both good and bad; it’s both too easy and wonderfully accessible. It can lead relationships of unexpected depth and friendships that prove to be far less real than one thinks they are. These have been experiences, and I think they’re true to people today, largely, as they were when my life was seeped into forums and AIM (!) and so forth so many years ago—its just that unlike young people, I have the benefit of hindsight now and can process what these relationships were and what they really meant, and can see how they’re both the same and different that those in the real world.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s